Question Title | Posted By | Question Date |
---|---|---|
Luisa Piccarreta's "Kingdom of the Divine Will" | John | Tuesday, May 22, 2007 |
Question: I have read large portions of Luisa Piccarreta's "Kingdom of the Divine Will" and, although it appears to be a beautiful love story between Luisa and her "Jesus", in my opinion there are grave doctrinal errors (viz. that Luisa's revelation is a brand new revelation never before revealed to the Church, and that it is binding for all Catholics to adhere to this new revelation, and secondly - that in order to receive this "Gift of the Divine Will", one has to annihilate one's human free will!). To me this seems heretical teaching, and yet Luisa Piccarreta's cause for beatification has been opened. How can this be? A number of my friends have been sucked into this heresy and Luisa's writings are being deseminated into Catholic parishes. Are we expected just to sit back until the Vatican makes a pronouncement on Luisa's writings, or would it be wrong to "pre-empt" the Vatican and take action now? What is your advice? God bless you - JOHN (from Sydney, Australia) |
||
Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OLSM
Dear John: There is much confusion concerning the writings of Luisa Piccarreta. This confusion is largely sourced in that she wrote in an Italian dialect (not standard Italian) and was not a learned person or theologian. Thus there are some real translation problems. Plus, commentaries and interpretations of her work have been very shoddy, made oftentimes by people who lack the proper theological competence. Because of that, one needs to be really careful in reading her works. Given the issues and problems of translation and nuanced theological issues we need to wait for the Holy See to make its evaluation. We need to avoid rash judgment. For example, to say that her writings are heretical is not proper. Neither you or I are competent to make that determination. What may seem to be heretical is most likely a bad translation of her works, or a misinterpretation of her ideas (which are not technically theological). We need to let the Holy See do its job in evaluating the works. Frankly, given the controversies and translation and interpretative problems, I personally think it best to set aside her writings for now and wait for the Church to evaluate and explain. As for her cause to sainthood, she is not a saint yet. That is under investigation and it may work out that she will not be declared a saint. That is for the Holy See to decide. But we need to remember that not everything a saint writes is correct just because they are a saint. We tend to think that, but it is not the case. We also must remember that Luisa lived in a different time and place that used language conventions rather foreign to us today. We see a similar problem with St. Louis de Montfort's classic work, True Devotion to Mary. Some of the phraseology used by St. Montfort could imply an improper worship of Mary. We know that is not what the Saint is saying, but it can appear that way to the modern ear. I think some of the misinterpretation of Luisa comes from something similar. Anyway, there is an excellent article that details this whole issue, the status of Luisa, the status of her writings, etc. at EWTN. Click here to read that article. It should answer your questions about her. God Bless, Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below: Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum. Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum
|