Ask a Question - or - Return to the Faith and Spirituality Forum Index

Question Title Posted By Question Date
Euthanasia? Therese Saturday, October 9, 2004

Question:

Dear Brother,

First of all, thank you for answering my questions so kindly-the ones I ask are hard to ask, and your answers clear up my confusion and comfort me.

I have been a neonatal nurse, caring for sick babies for 24 years--it has been not only my job but my calling. During a discussion with a co-worker about John Kerry, when I voiced my objection to his 100% pro-abortion voting record, this friend said he didn't understand my objection to that, when we obviously practice euthansia here in our unit.

He was just trying to be argumentative, but the statement bothers me just the same. In rare instances, when all hope is gone, and a baby is dying, and it is only a matter of a few hours or minutes, we will remove all life-support so he/she can die in mom's arms in peace--some of these babies have NEVER been held by anyone because of the critical nature of their illness; if mom is unwilling or unable to hold the baby, we will hold them ourselves.

I have always considered this a gift, certainly not euthanasia. We are not making a judgement, but trying to provide comfort and a peaceful death--it is so hurtful and sad when babies die without ever being held.

What does the Church say about stopping life support? I have always thought there is a difference between preserving life and prolonging death. Babies are born with some conditions that are not compatible with life or are fatal. When a baby was born with a progressive fatal neuromuscular disease and the neurologist suggested we withhold feedings, our whole unit rose up as a body and refused to starve her; our doctors sent her home with her family on tube feedings.

Are you familiar with Teri Schiavo's case in Florida? Why haven't more Catholic hierarchy spoken out in support of her life? This is all scary, disturbing stuff.

You can see by my email address who I am, but because of the nature of my question, I sign with the name of a favorite saint.

Thank you again, and God bless you for your time and patience.
Therese



Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OLSM+


Dear Therese:

I praise God that this ministry has been helpful to you. I also praise God for your ministry as a nurse to our children. I think it is a wonderful gift and ministry to hold these dying babies. That is truly treating them with the dignity they deserve.

As for Catholic teaching on withholding medical care, extraordinary measures can be withheld, but normal medical care must never be withheld and to do so is a direct killing of the person and constitutes murder. Hydration and nutrition is "normal" medical care and as such that means that starving the person to death cannot be done and is a grave sin.

Palliative is to be encouraged. The administration of pain killers and the like should be available to the person to make them as comfortable as possible, as long as the intention is to comfort the patient and not to kill him.

Here is the Catechism on the subject:

Euthanasia

2276 Those whose lives are diminished or weakened deserve special respect. Sick or handicapped persons should be helped to lead lives as normal as possible.

2277 Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable.

Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.

2278 Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate; it is the refusal of "over-zealous" treatment. Here one does not will to cause death; one's inability to impede it is merely accepted. The decisions should be made by the patient if he is competent and able or, if not, by those legally entitled to act for the patient, whose reasonable will and legitimate interests must always be respected.

2279 Even if death is thought imminent, the ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be legitimately interrupted. The use of painkillers to alleviate the sufferings of the dying, even at the risk of shortening their days, can be morally in conformity with human dignity if death is not willed as either an end or a means, but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable Palliative care is a special form of disinterested charity. As such it should be encouraged.

God Bless,
Bro. Ignatius Mary


Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below:
Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum.
Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum
Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum
Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum
Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum