Question Title | Posted By | Question Date |
---|---|---|
Failing to Confess a Sin | Christina | Tuesday, July 31, 2012 |
Question: Brother Ignatius Mary, |
||
Question Answered by
Dear Christina: I have changed the title of your question since your question really has nothing to do with impure sins. Rather, it has to do with failing to confess a mortal sin. I do not understand why you think it is so fantastical to learn that a Nun may have committed a mortal sin that she refused to confess because of embarrassment. That nun is a human being, as are brothers and priests. We all sin, and we are all susceptible to Pride. That is what embarrassment is—a form of pride. Pride is the first of the seven deadly sins. We are all inflicted with Pride. When pride gets in the way of confession, it can be deadly. When pride leads one to refuse to confess a mortal sin even unto his death, the result is death (hell). So the question is why is it so hard to confess these embarrassing sin, is answered, because of Pride. Pride will facilitate a multitude of sins. As for making a list of sins in preparation for confess, but forgetting some of them once the confession starts? Why didn't you take your list with you into the confessional? When making an examination of conscience, make a list, take it with you to the confessional, then afterward destroy the list so that no one can see it (such as burning it). A good confession must be complete in listing kind and number. To say, "I participated in x times, the sin of impurity" is not sufficient in my opinion because there are many, many forms of impurity. You need to specify verbally what sort of impurity you are guilt of. As a previous explained in another post, this does not mean the nitty-gritty details of a particular sex act. For example, if it is masturbation, one does not need to list the method of masturbation. But, masturbation needs to be specifically confessed. If there is even one unconfessed mortal sin on our soul at the time of our death, our destiny is hell. So we need to confess all known sins. One hour is not enough time for confessing 30 years of sinning? That is simply not true. If this is taking more than one hour that means you are explaining your sins, or telling the story about the sins, not listing them. Listing every sin as to kind that known to man would take around 20 minutes at best. As I mentioned in the previous post, explaining our sin is a form of excuse making. We should offer no excuses, no circumstances, no explanations, or whatnot. Just list the sin in kind and number. That is all. If and when the priest asks for more details should you provide the circumstances. If you avoid listing a sin because your time in confession is up, then you have not made a good confession. If I were you, I would avoid receiving Communion until you get to Confession again. This time make a list with kind and number and that is all. Do not explain the sins or give the backstory about them. Just list them. Here is an example:
On the priest's absolution covering sins not mentioned during the Confession. It is true that forgotten sins are absolved along with the specific sins confessed, but that only applies to genuinely forgotten sin. This does not apply, however, to failing to mention all sins because you ran out of time, or that you kept to yourself in your heart. The word "Confess" means to admit to a sin with your mouth, verbally. If you deliberately withhold any known grave sins from confession, then your confession is a bad one and must be done all over again, but this time mentioning the sins that were left out the first time. I hope this helps. God Bless, Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below: Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum. Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum
|