Ask a Question - or - Return to the Faith and Spirituality Forum Index

Question Title Posted By Question Date
Genuflection Ryan Sunday, August 7, 2011

Question:

Hello again, Brother. An incident happened at Mass today that left me profoundly embarrassed and disappointed. I am seeking your opinion about it.

The mass was going as usual until it was time for communion. I always sit in the front, so I was one of the first. When the priest proceeded in front of the altar (a priest I have known since I was 6 years old and have always looked up to, especially now that I'm discerning priesthood, as I went to the elementary school of that parish as a child), I specifically checked the area to make sure I had room, with no potential for anyone to trip over me, and no one had formed a line just yet. So, I decided to genuflect this time to receive communion, and made a very low, profound, though timely genuflection.

When I rose in my elation and faced the priest to receive communion, I arose to meet a severe glare (I don't use the word severe lightly) and right there he told me "You don't have to do that!" in front of the procession. I took communion and returned to my pew to pray, mortified and hurt.

At the end of the mass I was leaving, and the priest after shaking hands with me grabbed my arm to lead me back and said "It's not good to genuflect, do not do that. People might trip over you." Then he proceeded to shake hands with the few remaining in the congregation, and I waited right nearby in order to talk to him again and explain why I did it (I felt exceedingly devoted today because I had a great confession and a profound Blessed Sacrament experience earlier).

He either ignored or didn't take note of my presence, which I cannot know for sure but it seemed like he knew because I was very nearby, practically next to him. And after shaking hands with the last person, he started walking very fast away from me. But, still, to say he definitely ignored me would be rash judgment.

Anyway, I was extremely offended and disappointed that he would say such a thing with such an attitude. A cell phone rang loudly during communion, and he didn't even mention it after mass on the podium (as he usually always mentions things he doesn't like that happen during mass at that time). So, he glared at me and chastised me for genuflecting when I had space, but didn't seem to mind the imprudence of a cell phone not being properly shut off during the most Holy Eucharist.

I did not get angry with him or say anything mal-intentioned about him after mass, but I was very sad. Actually, I'm never going back to that church again - instead going to the parish of my newfound spiritual director. My family was extremely disappointed as well, as this was not the first time there was an issue with him, but until this particular one we patiently sustained the reality. But this went too far. They were so saddened that they too decided they would like to switch parishes. This priest was also pastor, and highly trusted by us for a long time.

Am I correct to deduce that it would be better for me to join another parish?



Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OMSM(r)

Dear Ryan:

Your pastor is totally out-of-line and disobeying the Vatican directive on this.

Universal Norm

From the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, 3rd edition, March 2002. 

The following norm is the universal norm found in the Roman Missal. Note that each Bishop Conference determines the particular norm for its own country. By the general law, each adaptation is then submitted to the Holy See for recognition.

160  The priest then takes the paten or ciborium and goes to the communicants, who, as a rule, approach in a procession.

The faithful are not permitted to take up the consecrated bread or the sacred chalice themselves, and still less hand them on to one another. The faithful may communicate either standing or kneeling, as established by the Conference of Bishops. However, when they communicate standing, it is recommended that they make an appropriate gesture of reverence, to be laid down in the same norms, before receiving the Sacrament.

U.S. Norm

The following adaptation of GIRM 160 was approved by the Holy See for the United States. 

160. The priest then takes the paten or ciborium and goes to the communicants, who, as a rule, approach in a procession.

The faithful are not permitted to take the consecrated bread or the sacred chalice by themselves and, still less, to hand them from one to another. The norm for reception of Holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing. Communicants should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.

When receiving Holy Communion, the communicant bows his or her head before the Sacrament as a gesture of reverence and receives the Body of the Lord from the minister. The consecrated host may be received either on the tongue or in the hand, at the discretion of each communicant. When Holy Communion is received under both kinds, the sign of reverence is also made before receiving the Precious Blood.

Recognized by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 17 April 2002, and, promulgated as particular law of the United States by Decree of the President of the USCCB, Bishop Wilton Gregory, 25 April 2002.

I also recommend the article, People Now Kneel to Receive Communion on the Tongue at Papal, Public Masses and also the Catholic News Service article, Bishop says Catholics should kneel, receive communion on tongue. Also see the Notitiae on this subject.

The pastor can explain the reason for the U.S. norm to you privately, which has nothing to do the tripping people; that is ridicules. Kneeling has been the universal norm for centuries and still is the universal norm. Kneeling is still practiced in other countries.

Perhaps Americans are too stupid to avoid tripping over someone? Actually, I can believe that. This country is the most profoundly immature society in the world and a constant thorn in the backside to the Pope.

Anyway, the Pastor has "informed" you. You do not have to find another parish, and shouldn't have to. I would continue to genuflect or kneel when receiving the Eucharist from him. If he scolds you again, and especially if he denies you the Eucharist, I would then file a formal complain to the bishop. If the bishop does nothing, then I would contact the Congregation for Divine Worship.

We can do that. In fact, the Congregation for Divine Worship sent this letter to a person complaining about this very thing:

 

Congregation de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum

Prot. n. 1322/02/L

Rome, 1 July 2002

Dear Sir,

This Congregation for Divine Worship gratefully acknowledges receipt of your letter, regarding an announced policy of denial of Holy Communion to those who kneel to receive it at a certain church.

It is troubling that you seem to express some reservations about both the propriety and the usefulness of addressing the Holy See regarding this matter. Canon 212 ¶2 of the Code of Canon Law states that "Christ's faithful are totally free to make known their needs, especially their spiritual ones, and their desire: to the Pastor of the Church". The canon then continues in ¶3: "According to their own knowledge competence and position, they have the right, and indeed sometimes the duty, to present to the sacred Pastor; their opinions regarding those things that pertain to the good of the Church".... Accordingly, in consideration of the nature of the problem and the relative likelihood that it might or might not be resolved on the local level, every member of the faithful has the right of recourse to the Roman Pontiff either personally or by means of the Dicasteries or Tribunals of the Roman Curia.

Another fundamental right of the faithful, as noted in canon 213, is "the right to receive assistance by the sacred Pastors from the spiritual goods of the Church, especially the word of God and the Sacraments". In view of the law that "sacred" ministers may not deny the sacraments to those who opportunely ask for them, are properly disposed and are not prohibited by law from receiving them" (canon 843 ¶ 1), there should be no such refusal to any Catholic who presents himself for Holy Communion at Mass, except in cases presenting a danger of grave scandal to other believers arising out of the person's unrepented public sin or obstinate heresy or schism, publicly professed or declared. Even where the Congregation has approved of legislation denoting standing as the posture for Holy Communion, in accordance with the adaptations permitted to the Conferences of Bishops by the Institution Generalis Missalis Romani n. 160, paragraph 2, it has done so with the stipulation that communicants who choose to kneel are not to be denied Holy Communion on these grounds.

Please be assured that the Congregation takes this matter very seriously, and is making the necessary contacts in its regard. At the same time, this Dicastery continues to be ready to be of assistance if you should need to contact it again in the future.

Thanking you for your interest, and with every prayerful good wish, I am

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Monsignor Mario Marini
Undersecretary

 

In case anyone needs it, here is the address:

Antonio Cañizares Llovera, Cardinal, Prefect
Congregation de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum
Palazzo delle Congregazioni
Piazza Pio XII, 10
00193 Roma, Italy

God Bless,
Bro. Ignatius Mary


Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below:
Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum.
Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum
Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum
Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum
Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum