Question Title | Posted By | Question Date |
---|---|---|
Indissoluble or not? | PJ | Wednesday, June 29, 2011 |
Question: Canon 1056 states: The essential properties of marriage are unity and indissolubility; in Christian marriage they acquire a distinctive firmness by reason of the sacrament. a. What does it mean that indissolubility becomes more firm with the sacrament of Christian marriage? I can understand the wills of the parties becoming more firm by sacramental grace to make good on the essentially indissoluble marriage they are in, but it makes no sense that indissolubility itself is made more firm. |
||
Question Answered by
Dear Paul: No one, not even the Pope, can dissolve a valid Sacramental marriage. There is nothing contradictory in Canon 1056. There is no language in the Canon that says "more firm". Rather it says that "in Christian marriage they acquire a distinctive firmness by reason of the sacrament." The canon is saying that the essential properties of marriage are made firm and indissoluble by the Sacrament. Only a Sacramental marriage is indissoluble. Non-Sacramental marriages can be dissolved. If two non-baptized persons marry, the marriage is not validly Sacramental. If a Catholic marries a non-believer (not Baptized), the marriage is not validly Sacramental. By the way, a Catholic has to have a dispensation from the Bishop to marry a non-believer; and has to get permission from the Bishop to marry a baptized non-Catholic Chrisitan. As for Pauline and Petrine privileges, those apply to non-Sacramental marriages. The Pauline privilege is described in 1 Corinthians 7:10-15:
If a Catholic marries a non-believer (not Baptized), the marriage is not Sacramental. The Catholic has to have a dispensation from the Bishop, by the way, to marry a non-believer. Anytime two baptized persons (one man and one woman) are married, Protestant or Catholic, the marriage is presumed to Sacramental and valid, unless evidence is revealed to suggest otherwise. The Pauline privilege says that in the case of two unbaptized persons marrying, then one of them converts and is baptized, the Christian may not leave the marriage. But, if the non-believing spouse leaves the marriage, the Christian spouse is free, by the Pauline Privilege, to marry again because the Christian's marriage was not Sacramental to begin with. The Petrine Privilege, also called Privilege of Faith, is reserved to the Holy See. The Petrine Privilege is an extension of the Pauline Privilege and again deals with a non-sacramental marriage. Borrowing the definition from the Archdiocese of Chicago:
What this means is that if non-believing person had a previous marriage and was non-believing all through the marriage (meaning that marriage was not sacramental), but now wishes to convert to Christianity, they may receive single status, which allows them to marry in the Church, due to the their new found Faith -- Privilege of Faith -- in which any future marriage they promise to be with a practicing Catholic. The same goes for a baptized Catholic who had a previous marriage with a non-baptized spouse. The Privilege of Faith is granted when the Catholic promises to enter into any future marriage with a baptized Christian. These cases of Pauline and Petrine Privilege deal with "natural marriage" and not Sacramental marriage (which is the only kind of marriage that is indissoluble). I know this is rather complicated, but there are no contradictions here. It has to do with Sacramentality. Either a marriage is Sacramental before God and His Church or it is not. If it is Sacramental no one can dissolve it. If is is not Sacramental, then it can be dissolved. God Bless, Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below: Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum. Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum
|