Ask a Question - or - Return to the Faith and Spirituality Forum Index

Question Title Posted By Question Date
Xmas follow up Ron Sunday, January 23, 2011

Question:

Dear Brother Mary Ignatius,
Thank you very much for your detailed answer to my "XMAS" question/commentary a week or so ago. I know you might not respond to this follow-up because I have no further questions on the topic as you have covered them all for my purposes, but I hope you read this as I want to say that overall I actually "liked" the answer. I guess I would have been a little deflated with your answer if I had responded to Joe's post in a scholastic or scientific way, but my reaction to the post was merely emotional; I did no research when asking the question.

You have educated me by providing a snippet of Church and linguistic history that may support the usage of "xmas". However, if most people knew this history (or if I somehow believed that most people knew) then I would not have had to ask the question.

In other words, this does not reconcile my feelings or attitudes to yours completely because I asked the question in personal (i.e. self-centered) terms, and I know the majority of people out there are like me who know little of the history you have provided. Furthermore, even if the early Church used an abbreviation for Christ, the letter of the English alphabet we use to represent Christ in the word "xmas" today does not have the same usage as it does in ancient Greek as it pertains to Christ (in my half-century-plus years of life I have never used it as such). But I did ask you for your thoughts on the subject, and I appreciate your frankness, but at first I was having a hard time figuring out how to use the information.

For example, if I come upon a situation in the future where a person uses "xmas" for Christmas, and if I then would use linguistic and Church history to rationalize its usage, yet knowing that the person who used the term probably is not aware of such history behind the usage, it would seem such an empty mitigation on my part. I think to myself, "Why bother?"

So you are definitely right that I am making too much about the word since I would generally not know in what context a person uses "xmas" and I guess I should use this part of your answer for practical purposes. That is, let it go...

And I owe Joe an apology because I was being judgmental, although it was not directed at him specifically.

Still, I don't like the term "xmas". Joe's post was just an excuse, I guess, for me to ask the question. At least I have the choice to not use it. Next year, I will, however, try to not be so judgmental when someone else uses the term.

Thank you again for answering my question in such a scholarly and respectful way, not to mention the time you took on the response. I honestly was afraid to look at your answer as I felt I might be getting a "scolding"!

Sincerely,
Ron



Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OMSM(r)

Dear Ron:

Well, Ron, you state that you were afraid that you would get a scolding with your last post. In this post you will get one.

The linguistic and historical facts about abbreviating the name of Christ, with the term Xmas or any other term, is not a rationalization my friend. It is a fact. The rationalizations are coming from you as you desperately try to defend your scrupulosity and prejudice over this issue.

This idea that "X" is not used the same way today as in ancient Greece is a ridicules assertion. That as much to do about nothing.  "X" is a symbol of Christ used by the Church today, in 2011. There are forms of the Cross that look like "X". In fact, many people were crucified on "x" style crosses. "X" as a symbol of of Cross is ancient and current. Whether you like it or not "X" is a legitimate symbol of Christ.

If people are ignorant of that fact, then the cure for ignorance is education, not abandoning words, phrases, or symbols because they are abused by contemporary society. If we were to abandon legitimate words and symbols because of contemporary abuse of them, then we must abandon the Cross itself, which is used by Heavy Metal Satanic bands, the word "Christian", which is used by people are are not Christian (such as Mormons, and Jehovah Witness, and other non-Christian sects), even the word "Christ" cannot be used because in the New Age the word "Christ" refers to the "christ-consciousness" concepts.

Ron, the entire notion that we cannot use certain words or symbols because the contemporary world has abused and bastardized them is a false notion and one that buys right into the devil's schemes.

But, if you wish to maintain this logic over the Xmas, then you must apply the same logic with the word Christmas. If you do not, then you are a hypocrite. Why? Because our culture today uses the word "Christmas" in the same way it uses "Xmas" -- with no thought of Christ. Christ has been taken out of Christmas without having to refer to it as Xmas (a term rarely used these days anyway).

People say the word Christmas all the time without a single thought of Christ, but rather of thoughts of family get-togethers and gift-giving, or nothing at all. Some spit out the word Christmas with irritation. Even some atheists use the word Christmas and they are not talking about Christ. To the world Christmas as become a mere holiday and that is all.

If you wish to be sure that Christ is kept in the name of the the holiday, then use its proper and official name: The Solemnity of the Nativity of our Lord.

But, you need to stop this emotional reaction toward this issue. The Church officially teaches that emotions are a great gift from God, but emotions must always be under the guidance of reason.

As for your judgments of Joe, you owe more than an apology to him. You committed the grave sin of rash judgment. You need to go to confession before receiving the Eucharist next time.

You do not have to use the term Xmas if you do not want to. In fact, I rarely see anyone of any stripe use that term these days. It is no big deal.

I applaud you in realizing that you need to refrain from sinful judgmentalness toward those who use the term, but you need to do more than refrain from those judgments. You also need to abandon the intellectual dishonesty seen in your rationalizations to hold on to your errant views of the issues. You also need to abandon the emotional reactions to something that is pointless. Submit your emotions to reason as the Church teaches.

We need to always stand for the truth, including the truth of the historical, linguistic, and current use by the Church of abbreviations for the name of Christ. When there is ignorance, then we must teach and inform and not allow the Enemy to get us to avoid terms and symbols.

We can be saddened by the flippancy and abusiveness by much of the contemporary world toward this Holy Day, but let us not abandon truth, which is the point of the holiday, the celebration of the God-Man who is the "truth, the way, and the life."

God Bless,
Bro. Ignatius Mary

 

 

 


Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below:
Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum.
Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum
Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum
Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum
Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum