Question Title | Posted By | Question Date |
---|---|---|
Water Baptism | Patrick | Sunday, September 27, 2009 |
Question: Hey, I've got a friend who does not believe baptism in water is salvific. I can and I have shared a lot with him about it. However, it maybe better to address his questions directly. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the subject. Below are his comments. Could you address those for me? I'm particularly interested in synecdoche approach. Is he using this approach appropriately? What can you tell me? Thanks !! I am not diminishing its importance, only noting that it is not salvific nor did the Apostles believe it to be. The sign that the Holy Spirit had brought about new creation was faith in King Jesus. Again, Peter was using synecdoche. It is simply a form of speech in which he used baptism to stand for the ontological change that occurs when one hears and belives the good news that Jesus is the King. |
||
Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OLSM
Dear Patrick: Your friend has quite an intellectual excursion there, but that is all that it is. Jesus said (John 3:5 using the KJV) "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water [we are re-born with baptism) and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That pretty much settle the issue. A couple more verses confirm this statement by Jesus in John: Jesus said, (MarK 16:16 KJV) "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." Peter said (Acts 2:38 KJV) "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." Christians have always interpreted the Bible literally when it declares, "Baptism . . . now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (1 Pet. 3:21; cf. Acts 2:38, 22:16, Rom. 6:3–4, Col. 2:11–12). The idea that Baptism is not salvific is a modern man-made invention. "Synecdoche" means "figure of speech". Baptism is not used as a synecdoche in the Bible. Baptism is a literal doctrine that must be applied to be "born again." To consider baptism as a synecdoche is intellectual dishonesty and wishful thinking on the part of Protestants who deny the clear teaching of the Bible and the teaching of the Christians for 2000 years to justify a novel man-made doctrine that was invented primarily as a protest against the Catholic Church. I'll refer you to several pamphlets that will go into some detail on this subject, including the words of the Church Fathers: Infant Baptism Also on the Scripture Catholic website is a list of the Scriptures that suppose Catholic Teaching on Baptism. On the Biblical Evidence for Catholicism website there are a list of articles, including a transcript of a debate about Baptism with a Protestant. All this should give you more than enough information. God Bless,
Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below: Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum. Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum
|