Ask a Question - or - Return to the Faith and Spirituality Forum Index

Question Title Posted By Question Date
Re: political question Gaby Thursday, September 2, 2004

Question:

I read your answer unfortunately I don't agree with you... I think that war is pure evil... and there aren't "good" and "Bad" wars, there is no moral in WAR. I dont agree with abortion ... but if you make war relative so can another person make abortion relative, saying that there are situation when abortion is justifiable. Now... in my country no president in 120 years have gone to war.... so I dont' think your point is valid.... my country has used negotiation and diplomacy and also the mediation of the Pope to avoid war...and I think that is what a Catholic needs to support .... life and PEACE.... Initiating a preemptive war (without any attack - 9/11 no relation with Iraq as the commision established- is inmoral in my opinion, especially when your neck is not in the line) I think it will be hipocrite to say that you dont support abortion and then agree with war where troops kill babies and their mothers with or without intention (Unwanted causalties as their are called, like when they bombarded a buuilding to kill Saddam). It is still killing, it is still murder... I wonder if God makes the distinction that you are making. I think that your advise is tinted by your political ideology.

Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OLSM+

Dear Gaby:

The Catholic Church officially teaches that abortion is inherently and objective evil.

The Catholic Church teaches that while war is an evil, war may be necessary to protect against an aggressor, and that there can be a Justifiable War.

And, sir, my answer has NOTHING to do with my political ideology; you do not know what my personal political ideolgy is. To make this statement shows your prejudice and is also a statement that is the sin of rash judgment.

I have no interest in your "opinion". Your opinion and my opinion are worthless. As the old saying goes, "Opinions are like armpits, everyone has them and they all stink."

This issue is not about opinion and is not subject to opinion. It is the Catholic Church, not you or me, that has the definitive authority from God to officially teach on subjects of faith and morals. When the Church teaches officially, it is God speaking. Thus the opinions we all have have no impact or validly.

I might also add, that in my answers on this subject I have NOT made ANY statement for or against the Iraqi War. My statements, rather, are statements of fact about the Church's teaching on the general subject of war; and also to correct the rash judgment and prejudiced comment that certain candidates for President are warmongers, which they are not. 

Anyway, here is the Church's official teaching on war:

Avoiding war

2307 The fifth commandment forbids the intentional destruction of human life. Because of the evils and injustices that accompany all war, the Church insistently urges everyone to prayer and to action so that the divine Goodness may free us from the ancient bondage of war.

2308 All citizens and all governments are obliged to work for the avoidance of war.

However, "as long as the danger of war persists and there is no international authority with the necessary competence and power, governments cannot be denied the right of lawful self-defense, once all peace efforts have failed."

2309 The strict conditions for legitimate defense by military force require rigorous consideration. The gravity of such a decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy. At one and the same time:

- the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

- all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

- there must be serious prospects of success;

- the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modem means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

These are the traditional elements enumerated in what is called the "just war" doctrine.

The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.

2310 Public authorities, in this case, have the right and duty to impose on citizens the obligations necessary for national defense.

Those who are sworn to serve their country in the armed forces are servants of the security and freedom of nations. If they carry out their duty honorably, they truly contribute to the common good of the nation and the maintenance of peace.

2311 Public authorities should make equitable provision for those who for reasons of conscience refuse to bear arms; these are nonetheless obliged to serve the human community in some other way.

2312 The Church and human reason both assert the permanent validity of the moral law during armed conflict. "The mere fact that war has regrettably broken out does not mean that everything becomes licit between the warring parties."

2313 Non-combatants, wounded soldiers, and prisoners must be respected and treated humanely.

Actions deliberately contrary to the law of nations and to its universal principles are crimes, as are the orders that command such actions. Blind obedience does not suffice to excuse those who carry them out. Thus the extermination of a people, nation, or ethnic minority must be condemned as a mortal sin. One is morally bound to resist orders that command genocide.

2314 "Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation." A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons - to commit such crimes.

2315 The accumulation of arms strikes many as a paradoxically suitable way of deterring potential adversaries from war. They see it as the most effective means of ensuring peace among nations. This method of deterrence gives rise to strong moral reservations. The arms race does not ensure peace. Far from eliminating the causes of war, it risks aggravating them. Spending enormous sums to produce ever new types of weapons impedes efforts to aid needy populations; it thwarts the development of peoples. Over-armament multiplies reasons for conflict and increases the danger of escalation.

2316 The production and the sale of arms affect the common good of nations and of the international community. Hence public authorities have the right and duty to regulate them. The short-term pursuit of private or collective interests cannot legitimate undertakings that promote violence and conflict among nations and compromise the international juridical order.

2317 Injustice, excessive economic or social inequalities, envy, distrust, and pride raging among men and nations constantly threaten peace and cause wars. Everything done to overcome these disorders contributes to building up peace and avoiding war:

Insofar as men are sinners, the threat of war hangs over them and will so continue until Christ comes again; but insofar as they can vanquish sin by coming together in charity, violence itself will be vanquished and these words will be fulfilled: "they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore."

Rome has spoken, the debate is ended.

God Bless,
Bro. Ignatius Mary


Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below:
Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum.
Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum
Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum
Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum
Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum