Ask a Question - or - Return to the Faith and Spirituality Forum Index

Question Title Posted By Question Date
Teachings on morality Susan Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Question:

Brother Ignatius,

I enjoy your forums here. You always explain things so clearly. I hope you can direct me as well.

A friend of mine left the church many years ago. She feels there are too many "rules" and the church is preoccupied with sex being "dirty" and is outdated regarding sexuality issues.

She cites the churching teaching that each person is to act in accordance with their own moral conscience;therefore, if someone wants to engage in sex outside of marriage, it is okay, birth control okay, sodomy, ok. etc. if they do not feel guilty doing it. I researched and found this in the Catechism (as well as a search on your forum and already read this) but this just floored me that she and apparently many other dissident Catholics rely on this excuse to justify their sinful behavior! How very convenient to use this teaching of the church to let yourself "off the hook" - of having any culpability whatsoever for your actions simply because and I quote her "I'm not hurting anyone and I don't feel like I am really sinning" so If I don't in my heart truly believe it is wrong, then it isn't wrong FOR ME - look it up yourself --the Church teaches this!"

How can I refute her - What an obvious misunderstanding and misintepretation of this teaching--isn't this thinking moral relativism? Why some sick minds might take it even further and somehow find it okay to steal and murder as well . Ridiculous!



Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OLSM

Dear Susan:

Your friend is exercising moral relativism. She is conveniently using the Church teaching on conscience out-of-context in order to justify her sin.

The Church does teach that we are to follow our conscience but we are to INFORM our conscience.

In the conscience of Susan Atkins, the Charlie Mason followers who killed Sharon Tate, it was okay to kill Tate and the others. In court she was asked if she felt any remorse for what she had done. Her answer was chilling. She looked the lawyer coldly in the eye and without any emotion and said, "Why should I feel guilty for doing what was right for me?"

If a person's conscience told them that to get closer to God they should walk off of a cliff and God will allow them to walk in mid-air, his conscience is wrong. His conscience needs to be informed of the ways of God and also of the Law of Gravity.

There are things that are absolutely wrong and sinful. They are objective sins. The funny things is that objective reality, Truth, is not dependent upon our opinions or our conscience. That is grave sin is grave sin period, for everyone, Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, Satanist, or whomever. While circumstances may mitigate the culpability for sin the sin remains a sin. But, it needs to be noted that feigned ignorance or obstinate opinion against the the truth does not decrease culpability, but "increases" culpability.

Your friend cannot say that she does not know that fornication, contraception, homosexual sex are sins. She may have a different opinion about them but she knows what the Church teaches, that is, what God teaches. In fact, she does feel guilt despite the fact that she says she doesn't. If she truly did not feel guilty she would not have bastardized the Church teaching to justify herself.

As for too many rules, I am always amused at this bit of rationalization. There are more rules for driving a car than there are in the Catholic Church. When someone says that the Church has too many rules what they are actually saying is that the Church has rules that they do not wish to follow -- usually involving sex.

If they wish to see an organization with a lot a rules check out Federal and State Laws. While people may not like this law or that most people will still obey them. And most people will not leave the country over it.

Your friend is merely wanting to set her own rules and is unwilling to follow God's rules. Her pride and lust are her gods.

Here is the actual church teaching from the Catechism:

 

I. THE JUDGMENT OF CONSCIENCE

1777 Moral conscience, present at the heart of the person, enjoins him at the appropriate moment to do good and to avoid evil. It also judges particular choices, approving those that are good and denouncing those that are evil. It bears witness to the authority of truth in reference to the supreme Good to which the human person is drawn, and it welcomes the commandments. When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God speaking.

1778 Conscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act that he is going to perform, is in the process of performing, or has already completed. In all he says and does, man is obliged to follow faithfully what he knows to be just and right. It is by the judgment of his conscience that man perceives and recognizes the prescriptions of the divine law:

Conscience is a law of the mind; yet [Christians] would not grant that it is nothing more; I mean that it was not a dictate, nor conveyed the notion of responsibility, of duty, of a threat and a promise. . . . [Conscience] is a messenger of him, who, both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a veil, and teaches and rules us by his representatives. Conscience is the aboriginal Vicar of Christ.

1779 It is important for every person to be sufficiently present to himself in order to hear and follow the voice of his conscience. This requirement of interiority is all the more necessary as life often distracts us from any reflection, self-examination or introspection:

Return to your conscience, question it. . . . Turn inward, brethren, and in everything you do, see God as your witness.

1780 The dignity of the human person implies and requires uprightness of moral conscience. Conscience includes the perception of the principles of morality (synderesis); their application in the given circumstances by practical discernment of reasons and goods; and finally judgment about concrete acts yet to be performed or already performed. The truth about the moral good, stated in the law of reason, is recognized practically and concretely by the prudent judgment of conscience. We call that man prudent who chooses in conformity with this judgment.

1781  Conscience enables one to assume responsibility for the acts performed. If man commits evil, the just judgment of conscience can remain within him as the witness to the universal truth of the good, at the same time as the evil of his particular choice. The verdict of the judgment of conscience remains a pledge of hope and mercy. In attesting to the fault committed, it calls to mind the forgiveness that must be asked, the good that must still be practiced, and the virtue that must be constantly cultivated with the grace of God:

We shall . . . reassure our hearts before him whenever our hearts condemn us; for God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything.

1782 Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. "He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters."

II. THE FORMATION OF CONSCIENCE

1783 Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.

1784 The education of the conscience is a lifelong task. From the earliest years, it awakens the child to the knowledge and practice of the interior law recognized by conscience. Prudent education teaches virtue; it prevents or cures fear, selfishness and pride, resentment arising from guilt, and feelings of complacency, born of human weakness and faults. The education of the conscience guarantees freedom and engenders peace of heart.

1785 In the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path, we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice. We must also examine our conscience before the Lord's Cross. We are assisted by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, aided by the witness or advice of others and guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church.

III. TO CHOOSE IN ACCORD WITH CONSCIENCE

1786 Faced with a moral choice, conscience can make either a right judgment in accordance with reason and the divine law or, on the contrary, an erroneous judgment that departs from them.

1787 Man is sometimes confronted by situations that make moral judgments less assured and decision difficult. But he must always seriously seek what is right and good and discern the will of God expressed in divine law.

1788 To this purpose, man strives to interpret the data of experience and the signs of the times assisted by the virtue of prudence, by the advice of competent people, and by the help of the Holy Spirit and his gifts.

1789 Some rules apply in every case:

- One may never do evil so that good may result from it;

- the Golden Rule: "Whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them."

- charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience: "Thus sinning against your brethren and wounding their conscience . . . you sin against Christ." Therefore "it is right not to . . . do anything that makes your brother stumble."

IV. ERRONEOUS JUDGMENT

1790 A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself. Yet it can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or already committed.

1791 This ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility. This is the case when a man "takes little trouble to find out what is true and good, or when conscience is by degrees almost blinded through the habit of committing sin."59 In such cases, the person is culpable for the evil he commits.

1792 Ignorance of Christ and his Gospel, bad example given by others, enslavement to one's passions, assertion of a mistaken notion of autonomy of conscience, rejection of the Church's authority and her teaching, lack of conversion and of charity: these can be at the source of errors of judgment in moral conduct.

1793 If - on the contrary - the ignorance is invincible, or the moral subject is not responsible for his erroneous judgment, the evil committed by the person cannot be imputed to him. It remains no less an evil, a privation, a disorder. One must therefore work to correct the errors of moral conscience.

1794 A good and pure conscience is enlightened by true faith, for charity proceeds at the same time "from a pure heart and a good conscience and sincere faith."

The more a correct conscience prevails, the more do persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and try to be guided by objective standards of moral conduct.

God Bless,
Bro. Ignatius Mary


Footer Notes: This forum is for general questions on the faith. See specific Topic Forums below:
Spiritual Warfare, demons, the occult go to our Spiritul Warfare Q&S Forum.
Liturgy Questions go to our Liturgy and Liturgical Law Q&A Forum
Liturgy of the Hours (Divine Office) Questions go to our Divine Office Q&A Forum
Defenfing the Faith Questions go to our Defending the Faith Q&A Forum
Church History Questions go to our Church History Q&A Forum