Question Title | Posted By | Question Date |
---|---|---|
The Song | kENNETH | Monday, January 23, 2012 |
Question: I am a 4th Degree Knight of Columbus and a Traditional Devout Catholic who is a Sinner. I would not hesitate to give my life for the Holy Catholic Faith and Church. From what I under- Why in God's Holy Name is it Played and Sung in Catholic Churches, especially during Holy Communion.How can this be allowed. I complained to the Grand Knight of our Council and he recommended that I bring it up to the Pastor of our Parish. I feel this is Traitorous to our Holy Catholic Faith and Church which always has been and still is being attacked from the outside and even worse from within. What do you recommend I do? |
||
Question Answered by Bro. Ignatius Mary, OMSM(r), L.Th., D.D.
Dear Kenneth: I recommend that you be careful about scrupilosity. Just because a hymn is written by a Protestant does not automatically make it problematic. After all, the Church officially teaches that truth can be found outside of the Catholic Church and where there is that truth to that degree, even if it is only a small grain of truth, we can agree with non-Catholics on that grain. With that said, here are the lyrics: Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound, T'was Grace that taught my heart to fear. Through many dangers, toils and snares The Lord has promised good to me. Yea, when this flesh and heart shall fail, When we've been here ten thousand years Most people against this hymn claim that it teaches Grace Alone. Indeed, since John Newton was a Calvinist, I am sure the Calvinist view, which is heretical, was on his mind. The actual words of the hymn, however, are not really clear. At best the hymn is ambivalent and subtle when looking only at the words, and not considering the author's intent. On the issue of Faith alone: The Catholic Church, in her document, Ephesians, chapter 2:8-10 says:
We cannot buy grace, we cannot earn grace. Grace by definition is a "free gift" of God. The controversy about Sola fide is really not so much about the grace part, inasmuch as it is about the faith part — the characteristics that someone with this faith will express in their lives. St. James says:
There is no contradiction between St. Paul and St. James, which is why it is really puzzling that Martin Luther, a educated Catholic monk, could so easily misinterpret this. Our salvation is by grace "through" faith, not works of the law. But what is faith? St. James says that "faith apart from works is dead", that is, if we have faith we will express that faith in the works of love. St. James was not talking about the works of the law as St. Paul was talking about. Thus, St. James says that if we say we have faith, and do not express that faith in the works of love, then our so-called faith is dead. If our faith is dead, then we have no faith, and then we do not have the saving grace which requires faith as St. Paul says. It is apples and oranges here between St. Paul and St. James. The Lutheran Church, by the way, in discussions with the Catholic Church, finally agreed, I think, that there is no conflict between the Catholic and Lutheran views. Finally after 450 years, the Lutherans finally saw that there were no contraditions between St. Paul and St. James. Back to the hymn, Colin Donovan, from the EWTN Q&A, focuses on the intent of the author:
The Bottomline: Unless the Church declares otherwise, it would appear that a person's personal opinion about Amazing Grace is up to personal conscience. But, the suitability of this hymn for liturgy is a completely different matter. I agree with Mr. Colin's last paragraph. I would certainly talk to your pastor about Amazing Grace being sung during Mass. You might also contact the bishop to get an official decision about this. God Bless,
|